just taking a sample of convenience and it’s unclear how participants were blinded to patch use in one case), were not registered on, and were not published in what I consider rigorous journals that are listed on PubMed. While LifeWave points to clinical studies (see links to two examples in the References section if you want to check them out for yourselves) in support of their X39 patches, the studies I found on these patches in my opinion are not convincing as they were small, had questionable or unclear methods (e.g. I also found no clinical trial listings on for a search for LifeWave and no relevant results for “X39” patches. I found 6 papers from a PubMed search for “LifeWave.” None of the papers provide concrete evidence to back up the claims about the patches in my view. How would that work exactly in terms of actual biology? It’s not at all clear. How would one little patch placed there impact systemic things like the claims related to improved sleep and wound healing elsewhere?Īs mentioned in the previous section, these patches are claimed to work by activating your stem cells. The LifeWave website instructs users to place the X39 patch on the skin of the back of the neck. No solid clinical trial data for LifeWave patches? Maintains healthy inflammatory response”.More energy and better sleep – must be experienced to be believed.Supports relief of minor aches and pains.Patented phototherapy is designed to elevate a peptide known to enhance stem cell activity.They state that the X39 patches do several medical-related things via that light exposure: Keep well hydrated while using this product.” Patches may be worn for up to 12 hours before discarding. Apply the patch to clean, dry skin in the morning. Here are the instructions: “ Place one LifeWave X39™ patch on the body, use one of the locations shown below. While as best as I can tell it does not actively emit new light itself like a bulb, it is claimed to expose the skin to only certain wavelengths of light. The LifeWave X39 patch is a device about the size of a quarter that you stick on your skin. What is the LifeWave X39 Patch | Data | GHK-Cu| No stem cell scientists? | Cost of X39: $150-$280 | LifeWave Review | Stem cell patches overall | References LifeWave X39 patch marketing image. Overall, my claim review is that in my opinion the X39 patch and its health claims do not appear to have solid peer-reviewed science behind them. If nothing else, people might be spending their money on something that isn’t worth it.Īs a stem cell biologist, how do I see LifeWave? What’s the claimed stem cell connection? Sometimes such products are used by tens of thousands of people, in my view potentially raising risks to the public. While few studies have evaluated the abilityĪnd efficiency of iPSCs to differentiate toward male germ cells in vitro by different inducers, the given effect was investigated in this review.I often learn about new supposedly stem cell-related products like the LifeWave X39 Patch from readers. Of germ cells is promising, especially in humans, to promote future reproductive andĭevelopmental engineering technologies. In this review we discussed past and recent advances in the in vitro differentiation of germ cells using pluripotent stem cells with an emphasis on iPSCs.Īlthough this domain of research is still in its infancy, exploring development mechanisms In vitro differentiation of iPSCs, have been demonstrated to produce functional gametes. Of stem cell biology becauase they are able to give rise to several different cellįeatures of lineages such as three-germ layers. There are numerous potential applications for iPSCs in the field Using a new technology known as cellular reprogramming, which can use gene transduction Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) refer to stem cells that are artificially produced
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |